<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Seattle Conference on Scalability &#8212; 2008 Edition.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bzimmer.ziclix.com/2008/06/16/google-seattle-conference-on-scalability-2008-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bzimmer.ziclix.com/2008/06/16/google-seattle-conference-on-scalability-2008-edition/</link>
	<description>Whatever's top of mind.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: bzimmer</title>
		<link>http://bzimmer.ziclix.com/2008/06/16/google-seattle-conference-on-scalability-2008-edition/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>bzimmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 03:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bzimmer.wordpress.com/?p=59#comment-14</guid>
		<description>@Mark:  The Carmen talk mentioned science-specific but it really comes down to making abstractions to fit different problem spaces and lowering the cost of entry.  As another example, I know some sites using clouds to render images, each inventing their own systems.  It would seem to make sense to build out a cloud specific to this problem domain.

As I mentioned in the post, different programming languages are developed to serve different needs and as clouds mature I'd expect to see the sector follow suit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark:  The Carmen talk mentioned science-specific but it really comes down to making abstractions to fit different problem spaces and lowering the cost of entry.  As another example, I know some sites using clouds to render images, each inventing their own systems.  It would seem to make sense to build out a cloud specific to this problem domain.</p>
<p>As I mentioned in the post, different programming languages are developed to serve different needs and as clouds mature I&#8217;d expect to see the sector follow suit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Mark Johnson</title>
		<link>http://bzimmer.ziclix.com/2008/06/16/google-seattle-conference-on-scalability-2008-edition/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Mark Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 22:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bzimmer.wordpress.com/?p=59#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Excellent write up.

Three cheers for domain-specific abstraction of cloud computing.  I think that would be an great followup topic for next year's conference.  I did not however get much inspiration in this direction from this years presentations.  Was there something in particular disseminated regarding such?  Alas, I did not attend the last two presentations of the day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent write up.</p>
<p>Three cheers for domain-specific abstraction of cloud computing.  I think that would be an great followup topic for next year&#8217;s conference.  I did not however get much inspiration in this direction from this years presentations.  Was there something in particular disseminated regarding such?  Alas, I did not attend the last two presentations of the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
